SPEARMAN RANK CORRELATION COEF: 

 DATA ECHO:
  GROUP ==> a1 <==
		rank  obsvd.
	         1.5  1.5
	         1.5  1.5
	         3.5  3.5
	         3.5  3.5
	         5.0  5.
	         6.0  6.
	         7.0  7.
	         8.0  8.
	         9.0  9.
	        10.5  10.5
	        10.5  10.5
	        12.0  12.
  GROUP ==> strivings <==
		rank  obsvd.
	         3.0  3.
	         4.0  4.
	         2.0  2.
	         1.0  1.
	         8.0  8.
	        11.0  11.
	        10.0  10.
	         6.0  6.
	         7.0  7.
	        12.0  12.
	         5.0  5.
	         9.0  9.
  GROUP ==> xscore <==
		rank  obsvd.
	         1.0  1.
	         2.5  2.
	         2.5  2.
	         4.0  3.
	         5.0  4.
	         6.0  5.
	         7.0  6.
	         8.0  8.
	         9.0  9.
	        10.0  10.
  GROUP ==> yielding <==
		rank  obsvd.
	         1.5  1.5
	         1.5  1.5
	         3.5  3.5
	         3.5  3.5
	         5.0  5.
	         6.0  6.
	         7.0  7.
	         8.0  8.
	         9.0  9.
	        10.5  10.5
	        10.5  10.5
	        12.0  12.
  GROUP ==> yscore <==
		rank  obsvd.
	         1.5  2.
	         3.0  3.
	         1.5  2.
	         5.0  5.
	         5.0  5.
	         8.5  7.
	         5.0  5.
	         7.0  6.
	         8.5  7.
	        10.0  8.



CONCLUSION(a1 vs strivings):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = .615123
	n = 12
	df = 10
	calculated t = 2.46716

   ONE-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 1.8125
		it is likely Rs is significant.

   TWO-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 2.22797
		it is likely Rs is significant.



CONCLUSION(a1 vs xscore):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = 1.02467
	n = 12
	df = 10
	can't divide:1-Rs almost zero (Siegel 9.8).
		probably highly significant.

	WARNING:COUNTS UNEQUAL:a1=12 xscore=10
		expect flakey stats



CONCLUSION(a1 vs yielding):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = 1.
	n = 12
	df = 10
	can't divide:1-Rs almost zero (Siegel 9.8).
		probably highly significant.



CONCLUSION(a1 vs yscore):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = .946376
	n = 12
	df = 10
	calculated t = 9.26342

   ONE-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 1.8125
		it is likely Rs is significant.

   TWO-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 2.22797
		it is likely Rs is significant.

	WARNING:COUNTS UNEQUAL:a1=12 yscore=10
		expect flakey stats



CONCLUSION(strivings vs xscore):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = .713384
	n = 12
	df = 10
	calculated t = 3.21919

   ONE-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 1.8125
		it is likely Rs is significant.

   TWO-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 2.22797
		it is likely Rs is significant.

	WARNING:COUNTS UNEQUAL:strivings=12 xscore=10
		expect flakey stats



CONCLUSION(strivings vs yielding):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = .615123
	n = 12
	df = 10
	calculated t = 2.46716

   ONE-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 1.8125
		it is likely Rs is significant.

   TWO-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 2.22797
		it is likely Rs is significant.



CONCLUSION(strivings vs yscore):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = .729204
	n = 12
	df = 10
	calculated t = 3.3698

   ONE-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 1.8125
		it is likely Rs is significant.

   TWO-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 2.22797
		it is likely Rs is significant.

	WARNING:COUNTS UNEQUAL:strivings=12 yscore=10
		expect flakey stats



CONCLUSION(xscore vs yielding):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = 1.02467
	n = 10
	df = 8
	can't divide:1-Rs almost zero (Siegel 9.8).
		probably highly significant.

	WARNING:COUNTS UNEQUAL:xscore=10 yielding=12
		expect flakey stats



CONCLUSION(xscore vs yscore):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = .913422
	n = 10
	df = 8
	calculated t = 6.34757

   ONE-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 1.85918
		it is likely Rs is significant.

   TWO-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 2.30552
		it is likely Rs is significant.



CONCLUSION(yielding vs yscore):
	Spearman Rank Correlation Coeff. (Rs) = .946376
	n = 12
	df = 10
	calculated t = 9.26342

   ONE-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 1.8125
		it is likely Rs is significant.

   TWO-TAILED TEST (p=0.05)
	tabulated t = 2.22797
		it is likely Rs is significant.

	WARNING:COUNTS UNEQUAL:yielding=12 yscore=10
		expect flakey stats
